Branney et al.- 'Three steps to open science' - some of this fits with what I've suggested here, and on other points I think we take rather different views: https://psyarxiv.com/ahdcu/
Pownall - 'Is replication possible for qualitative research?' - more optimistic than me, I think, about the potential for space within science which is amenable to the commitments of qualitative research: https://psyarxiv.com/dwxeg/
Prosser et al. - 'When open data closes the door' - more extensive examples of areas where the commitments of qualitative research don't align well with the requirements of open data: https://psyarxiv.com/5yw4z/
Useful further reading:
Branney et al.- 'Three steps to open science' - some of this fits with what I've suggested here, and on other points I think we take rather different views: https://psyarxiv.com/ahdcu/
Pownall - 'Is replication possible for qualitative research?' - more optimistic than me, I think, about the potential for space within science which is amenable to the commitments of qualitative research: https://psyarxiv.com/dwxeg/
Prosser et al. - 'When open data closes the door' - more extensive examples of areas where the commitments of qualitative research don't align well with the requirements of open data: https://psyarxiv.com/5yw4z/
Chauvette et al. - 'Open data in qualitative research' - shares a lot of similar concerns to me, I think, but have written a properly referenced academic paper to express them! https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406918823863
Michael